 |
Duration: 06:49 minutes Upload Time: 2007-11-16 04:08:43 User: TheAmazingAtheist :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: DON'T HATE! DONATE! http://www.terroja.com ARTICLE: http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/laworder/story/A5E1FF8453EF5C2586257394005C3087?OpenDocument |
|
Comments | |
| 0neironaut ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 17:32:04 ahahaha "i need money. donate". youre a piece of shit. but then again, if people are actually dumb enough to send you money... haha youre still a son of a bitch! __________________________________________________ | |
| BecksInSpecs ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 17:35:34 I agree that we are part of the animal kingdom but that does not excuse the behavior. We do have some sort of moral code -said code isn't handed down from some omnipotent being but I think it's fair to say human beings are hard-wired with some sort of mechanism which allows us to function in a society. there is a small segment of the population that is miswired - the monsters - there is no "addressing the behavior": those types of monsters TAA describes cannot be helped. __________________________________________________ | |
| DeniseBJ420 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 17:35:57 Im not talking about the threat of punishment. Im talking about having a relationship with your child and knowing if that child is dangerous, then taking the proper actions to help the child. Im sure that child wasnt a picture perfect child before hand. Children arent born bad, the adapt to the society around them. __________________________________________________ | |
| BecksInSpecs ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 17:37:33 The two halves of the human brain does not fully fuse together until about age 22. I would consider any human with a brain that is not fully fused to be a child. I am not excusing this child's behavior but am merely making the point that 13, in most cases, is under the classification of child. __________________________________________________ | |
| BecksInSpecs ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 17:39:28 I hate your screenname - I actually watch VenomFangX's videos and I fucking hate them, and so then I see your screen name and I want to spew my hatered for him at you ... that's crap. __________________________________________________ | |
| pyr666 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 18:04:50 so the society around them has a large impact right? who is to say the parents actions (or lack there of) are the cause of negative behavior? isn't it entirely possible that the parents actions were entirely positive, but where simply overwhelmed by the negative influence from outside sources? __________________________________________________ | |
| shuu7777 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 19:08:14 jesus will lead us! __________________________________________________ | |
| DeniseBJ420 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 20:22:09 It is right that she was held accountable.I wasnt old enough to be countable for myself so it is her responsability.If my dog was loose and attacked someone I would be held responsable,same principle.There are 4 parents here that failed both children,where are they?Not just the mothers but all 4 parents.Children dont come with handbooks,they are the most simple, pure and beautiful things on this earth,they learn what they live.You want to punish someone,punish the parents who failed them. __________________________________________________ | |
| teamhex ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 21:17:57 Good point, fucked up what he did, but 60 years is to much. __________________________________________________ | |
| pyr666 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 21:19:07 you haven't proven anything. you basically said "it is, so there" you can chain a dog to a stake in your backyard, you can shut them in your house all day and they can't change that. you HAVE TO send them to school, let them go out into the world. you have no idea where the parents are, you just know some kid did something bad, and you immediately say "blame the parents". I have yet to see evidence that this is the parents fault. __________________________________________________ | |
| spiderofdoom ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 21:23:51 from the article: "Under the juvenile offender program... Burnett would get counseling, sex offender treatment and education that he couldn't get in prison." So they had an option. It wouldn't shorten his sentence unless he'd gotten better. __________________________________________________ | |
| spiderofdoom ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 21:24:51 sorry, I should clarify that comment: they could've sent him to a juvenile offender program that would offer counselling and treatment and education, but instead he's been sentenced as an adult, and missed out on that. __________________________________________________ | |
| xoxgodofgodsgodxx ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 21:47:00 huh, my junior high teacher told us about this: the woman is blind to race, blind to gender and most of all, BLIND TO SOB STORIES __________________________________________________ | |
| DeniseBJ420 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 22:13:28 The parent should know where their child is. If the child was at school then the school is at fault. They are children. There is a reason they are seperated by age. The adults in charge of the children are at fault. There is no other way around it. __________________________________________________ | |
| AntiChrist67 ::: Favorites 2007-11-19 22:26:01 Even if he is a boy, he is still a danger to society, in particular to little white girls, and as such this evil human piece of sh*t must be locked up to protect the innocent and to make him suffer for what he did to that 6-year old white girl. __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment