Duration: 03:03 minutes Upload Time: 2007-10-08 01:33:29 User: greenback001 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: This video destroys the tactic of labeling anyone who wants 9/11 Truth as a Conspiracy Theorist (used specifically as a derogatory comment, insinuating someone is mentally challenged; i.e. Bill Maher saying Truthers need Paxal). This video pounds home the message that questioning 9/11 is not crazy and in fact is very Patriotic. Those trying to say such things fall now into the category of Idiots. This is a unique video and it's message is undeniable: Demand 9/11 Truth! |
|
Comments | |
themightysprinvvater ::: Favorites It's the truthers vs the liars, whos gonna win? Read the bible,the righteous shall inherit the earth. Or look out the window at the endless truth and majesty that extends into every particle of the solar system. I already know whos winning. Truth be told. 07-10-12 01:16:21 __________________________________________________ | |
theundead505 ::: Favorites Greenback back how come you're never featured? This is way more important than watching some Blind guy paint. Seriously 07-10-11 16:36:58 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites google WTC 7 and just watch the building collapse 07-10-10 00:56:08 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites By the way, there is still no official explanation for how WTC 7 collapsed. It's been 6 years and they still can't come up with even a decent lie. 07-10-10 00:45:08 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites That is a lie. Jwenko said WTC 1&2 certainly had the characteristics of a CD and that WTC 7 was absolutely a CD. WTC 7 was about 250 yds away from the WTC1 with WTC 5&6 stadning between them, blocking debris. Both WTC 5&6 withstood the full load of the WTC1 and did not collapse. The Winter Garden, a giant greenhouse also 250 yards away and didn't collapse. WTC 7 had no significant structural damage. It came down at freefall speed in it's own footprint. 07-10-10 00:41:29 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites That is a lie. Jwenko siad they certainly have the characteristics of a CD and that WTC was absolutely a CD. WYC was about 250 yds away from the WTC1 with WTC 5&6 stadning between, blocking debris. Both 5&6 withstood the full load of the WTC1 and did not collapse. The Winter Garden, a giant greenhouse also 250 yards away and didn't collapse. WTC 7 had no significant structural damage. 07-10-10 00:37:57 __________________________________________________ | |
Iommi63 ::: Favorites Jwenko made an off the cuff remark after watching the video. He was never told about the immense structural and fire damage to WTC7. What type of expert in the right mind comment with certainty without studying the particular situation. BTW, Jwenko is on record as saying WTC1 & 2 were not CD! 07-10-09 22:45:59 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites HDvorak, hello. no answer. uhmm, I wonder why 07-10-09 22:27:43 __________________________________________________ | |
greenback001 ::: Favorites Great idea ae911truth (dot) org 07-10-09 21:49:10 __________________________________________________ | |
HDvorak ::: Favorites Sorry, but I'm not posting my name and risking harrasment. Why not post those hundreds of design professionals building skyscrapers who believe in the troof? A coworker has already had teens in black teeshirts posting on internet site that he's afraid of da twoof. 07-10-09 21:45:42 __________________________________________________ |
Friday, October 12, 2007
Idiots & Patriots
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment